Washington, D.C. – A conservative speechwriter, Michael Anton, who was considered a front-runner for the position of deputy national security adviser in the Trump administration, has reportedly withdrawn from the running due to his reluctance to work alongside Sebastian Gorka, the president-elect’s choice for counter-terrorism adviser.

The decision highlights the strained relationship between the two individuals, with Anton opting out of consideration following Gorka’s controversial appointment. Gorka, known for his hardline views on Islam and previous associations with the National Defense University, has faced criticism for his Islamophobic remarks and extreme stances on national security issues.

John Kelly, the former White House chief of staff, is believed to have played a role in Anton’s departure, as he sought to bring order to the chaotic environment of Trump’s initial months in office. Gorka’s return to the administration has sparked disapproval among members of the national security transition team, who reportedly view him unfavorably.

Despite Anton’s own conservative views on Islam, which he has characterized as a “militant faith,” he found Gorka’s beliefs to be even more extreme. Gorka, who previously served in Trump’s administration and advocated for the controversial Muslim travel ban, has been criticized for his inflammatory rhetoric and portrayal of Islam as a threat to Western civilization.

The tension between Anton and Gorka underscores the contentious atmosphere within the Trump administration regarding national security and counter-terrorism strategies. While Gorka has dismissed criticisms as “fake news,” his qualifications have been questioned by former national security adviser John Bolton, who labeled him a “conman” and called for an FBI investigation into his credentials.

Gorka’s controversial affiliations, including wearing an honorary medal from a Hungarian nationalist organization with ties to the Holocaust, have further fueled concerns about his suitability for a key role in shaping U.S. counterterrorism efforts. His uncompromising views on religious ideology and terrorism have raised alarms among critics who fear that his appointment could undermine effective counterterrorism initiatives.