Washington, D.C. — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing significant backlash from nine former directors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In a stark guest essay published Monday, they criticized Kennedy’s leadership as detrimental to public health and unlike any previous administration’s actions. This commentary arrived shortly after President Donald Trump dismissed CDC Director Susan Monarez, who claimed she resisted orders that lacked a scientific foundation.

The essay, conveying profound concern for the nation’s health security, describes Kennedy’s recent decisions as alarming and unprecedented. The former directors express grave worries about his focus on questionable treatments while undermining the importance of vaccines. Their piece alleges that he has rescinded crucial investments in medical research, potentially jeopardizing future health responses.

The former CDC leaders specifically criticized Kennedy’s approach to committee memberships, claiming he replaced seasoned experts with individuals who align with his controversial views. They argue that his actions may hinder the effectiveness of national health strategies, particularly regarding vaccination programs that safeguard millions globally.

Monarez’s firing has intensified scrutiny, particularly concerning her alarm over Kennedy’s management of a pivotal vaccine advisory committee. Reports indicate that Kennedy’s influence led to the dismissal of numerous committee members, raising concerns about the integrity of vaccine recommendations that should be grounded in scientific evidence. Her termination has already resulted in a quick succession of resignations from other CDC leadership positions.

In their essay, the former directors called for Congress to take an active role in overseeing the Department of Health and Human Services, urging state and local authorities, along with charitable organizations, to step in to address funding shortages. They emphasized the importance of transparent, science-based decisions in public health, underscoring that past leaders have consistently relied on data for the safety of the American public.

Moreover, they shared their experiences of unity during their terms, noting disagreements were common but always within the framework of shared commitment to informed decision-making benefitting public health workers and the wider community. They expressed their dismay at the shift from this principle under Kennedy’s current administration.

In closing, the former directors reaffirmed their belief in the dedication of CDC personnel who have, for decades, prioritized public service over personal ambitions. They asserted that the nation deserves a health secretary who truly champions scientific integrity and stands unwaveringly behind the workforce tasked with preserving health security.