Washington, D.C. – A top official in the Trump administration, Pete Marocco, known for his role in dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID), has departed from the state department, as confirmed by a US official on Sunday.
Marocco’s departure follows the administration’s controversial decision to terminate a significant number of USAID staff, under the direction of billionaire Elon Musk’s “department of government efficiency.” This move aimed to reduce spending and eliminate contractors throughout various federal agencies, citing a crackdown on wasteful expenditures.
During his tenure, Marocco conducted a thorough review of foreign assistance spending, uncovering instances of misuse of taxpayer funds. A senior administration official, speaking anonymously, praised Marocco’s efforts, stating that significant achievements lie ahead for him in his future endeavors.
Sources revealed that Marocco, who held the position of director of foreign assistance at the state department, may have been forced out, although specific reasons for his departure remain undisclosed.
Recently, Marocco convened a session at the state department to engage with experts and stakeholders on the future of foreign assistance. This gathering underscores the ongoing discussions and decisions shaping US foreign aid policy.
Upon his return to the state department, Marocco expressed his commitment to enhancing the value of foreign assistance for the American people. These sentiments align with the administration’s efforts to combat alleged fraud within USAID, a claim supported by Trump and Musk, despite lacking evidence.
In a surprising turn of events, the administration decided to reinstate several US foreign aid programs for emergency food assistance, reversing previous cancellations. The erratic nature of these decisions highlights the challenges posed by rapid changes to foreign aid policies, causing disruptions to humanitarian operations on a global scale.
Marocco’s departure signals a significant shift within the state department and raises questions about the future direction of US foreign assistance under the current administration’s leadership. His exit marks the end of a chapter characterized by intense scrutiny and reforms within USAID, setting the stage for potential changes in the management of international aid programs moving forward.