Washington, D.C. – A federal judge has issued a temporary order blocking parts of President Trump’s executive order targeting the prominent law firm Perkins Coie for its representation of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and causes unpopular with the administration. The order, issued by Trump last week, accuses Perkins Coie of “dishonest and dangerous activity” and imposes punitive measures such as suspending security clearances and prohibiting government contractors from working with the firm.

At a hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that the president’s order against Perkins Coie is intended to punish the firm and likely violates its constitutional rights. Howell emphasized the importance of all parties having zealous advocates in the justice system, even those with unpopular ideas.

The executive order, titled “Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP,” alleges that the law firm sought to undermine democratic elections, the integrity of the courts, and law enforcement. It specifically references Perkins Coie’s representation of Clinton’s campaign and its involvement in creating a dossier of unverified allegations regarding ties between Trump’s campaign and Russia.

Perkins Coie, represented by attorneys from Williams & Connolly, has already felt the impact of the order on its business. The firm claims that long-time clients have ended their relationships, and federal prosecutors have refused to meet with its attorneys representing clients.

The government, represented by Attorney General Pam Bondi’s chief of staff, argued that the president has the executive authority to take action against companies considered untrustworthy with national secrets. However, Howell cautioned that the executive order casts a chilling effect on the legal profession and may be seen as an attempt to intimidate attorneys.

Wednesday’s hearing occurred shortly after Perkins Coie sued the government, labeling Trump’s order as a violation of the Constitution. The ongoing legal battle highlights the tension between the Trump administration’s efforts to target perceived adversaries and the constitutional rights of individuals and organizations.