San Francisco, Calif. — Just hours after former President Donald Trump unveiled his executive order on artificial intelligence (AI), Governor Gavin Newsom struck back, claiming the directive prioritizes corporate interests over genuine innovation. Newsom sharply criticized the order, which aims to prevent individual states from implementing their own AI regulations, as a tool “advancing grift and corruption.”

In a statement, Newsom characterized Trump’s actions and those of his advisor David Sacks as deceptive maneuvers rather than legitimate policy-making. “Every day, they push the limits to see how far they can take it,” he added, illustrating the tensions brewing between state officials and the federal administration.

The executive order represents a significant win for major technology firms that have lobbied against regulatory obstacles in the development and deployment of their AI products. This move is likely to exacerbate the ongoing clash between state governments and the White House regarding the future of AI oversight, as various organizations, including child advocacy groups and labor unions, expressed immediate opposition to the order.

Legal experts and lawmakers quickly called into question the validity of Trump’s executive action, suggesting it may overstep federal authority by undermining state legislation on AI. California, home to numerous influential AI companies, has emerged as a focal point for opposition, with officials asserting their intent to challenge the order through legal channels.

Democratic representatives in California voiced fierce criticism of the executive order. Representative Sara Jacobs described it as “deeply misguided” and indicated that legislative and judicial responses would be explored to contest the directive. State Attorney General Rob Bonta also indicated plans to scrutinize the legality of the order, paving the way for a potentially landmark confrontation between California and the federal government.

Earlier this year, California enacted a groundbreaking law requiring AI developers to issue transparency reports and promptly address safety incidents, establishing a framework that many viewed as a model for national policy. “Our state’s status as a global leader in technology allows us a unique opportunity to provide a blueprint for well-balanced AI policies,” Newsom remarked in a recent address, asserting the necessity of transparency and safety in AI development.

The federal executive order called for a new task force to review state laws that do not align with the goal of enhancing America’s global AI dominance. Critics have argued that this move lacks a comprehensive federal regulatory framework, further portraying the order as a handout to tech companies, many of which have cultivated close ties with the current administration.

Opposition to the order quickly reverberated beyond California, with comments pouring in from lawmakers across the nation. Some argued that it fosters a “lawless” environment for AI businesses. Others, like Virginia Congressman Don Beyer, condemned the order as “a terrible idea” that could lead to unchecked practices in the AI sector.

Concerns are growing among child safety advocates, particularly in light of tragic incidents linked to AI interactions. James Steyer of Common Sense Media stressed that the relentless push for technological engagement is costing lives, declaring, “Americans deserve better than tech industry handouts at the expense of their wellbeing.”

A group of bereaved parents and organizations dedicated to child protection have also asserted their strong opposition to the executive order, calling it “unacceptable.” They are advocating for robust regulations to safeguard children from potential threats posed by AI technologies and social media. Sarah Gardner, CEO of one child advocacy group, highlighted that parents will not stand by while their children become “lab rats” in experiments prioritizing profit over safety.

As states brace for the fallout from this controversial executive order, the debate over the balance between technological progress and regulatory oversight continues to intensify, highlighting the complexities of governing in the age of artificial intelligence.