WASHINGTON (AP) — Significant changes have been made to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in recent weeks, causing concern among aid organizations about the future of humanitarian assistance programs. President Donald Trump’s administration has implemented freezes, layoffs, and a reevaluation of foreign assistance, affecting thousands of programs worldwide.

Established by President John F. Kennedy during the Cold War, USAID has played a crucial role in countering Soviet influence and providing foreign aid in countries around the world. However, the agency has faced scrutiny from both Republicans and Democrats over its funding and operations.

Since Trump took office, USAID has experienced a freeze on foreign assistance, leading to the shutdown of numerous projects and layoffs of personnel. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has attempted to keep life-saving emergency programs operational during this period of uncertainty, but the effects of the freeze are still being felt globally.

Critics of USAID argue that the agency’s programs are wasteful and promote a liberal agenda, while supporters emphasize the importance of U.S. assistance in countering other global influences like those from Russia and China. The current administration’s crackdown on federal programs, including USAID, has left aid workers and organizations struggling to navigate the changes.

The freeze on U.S.-funded programs has had wide-reaching effects, particularly in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Programs assisting HIV patients, migrants, and LGBTQ+ youth have faced disruptions, impacting vulnerable populations in need of support.

Despite the U.S. being the largest provider of humanitarian assistance globally, public opinion on foreign aid varies. Polls have shown that a significant number of Americans believe the government spends too much on foreign aid, while others argue for more focus on domestic issues like education and healthcare.

As questions arise about the future of USAID and foreign aid funding, the aid community continues to grapple with the implications of the administration’s actions. The ongoing review of programs and projects will determine the direction of U.S. assistance overseas, highlighting the complex dynamics of international aid in an ever-changing political landscape.