Washington, D.C. – President Joe Biden’s lackluster debate performance has sparked concerns within the Democratic Party about the future of their campaign leading up to November. As the 81-year-old president continues to face challenges with his health and ability to campaign effectively, questions arise about whether Democrats have any other viable options moving forward.

Despite securing a presumptive nomination, Biden’s recent performance, marked by a hoarse voice and disjointed delivery, has raised doubts about his capacity to serve another four-year term. Former campaign strategist to President Barack Obama, David Axelrod, expressed concerns about Biden’s ability to continue, hinting at possible discussions within the party regarding his candidacy.

The discussions surrounding Biden’s candidacy prompt a look back at historical precedents, such as President Lyndon Johnson’s decision not to seek re-nomination in 1968 amidst mounting Vietnam War protests. Unlike Johnson, Biden has already gathered enough delegates for the nomination, making his removal from the ticket a challenging task.

Timing becomes a crucial factor in determining the feasibility of any changes within the Democratic Party, with deadlines for ballot submissions and convention proceedings looming. Despite potential successors like Vice President Kamala Harris and Governors Gavin Newsom, J.B. Pritzker, and Gretchen Whitmer, the impact of replacing Biden at this stage remains uncertain.

Financial considerations also come into play, with modern presidential campaigns requiring significant funding. While Biden’s campaign and party have substantial financial reserves, transitioning to a new candidate would necessitate additional expenses to introduce them to voters. This financial aspect adds complexity to the decision-making process within the Democratic Party.