Pierre, South Dakota – South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem faced backlash after revealing in her upcoming book that she had to put down her unruly 14-month-old hunting dog. Noem defended her actions, stating that she did not violate any laws by euthanizing the dog, despite criticism from both parties and the public.

In response to the outrage, Noem explained that South Dakota law allows dogs who attack and kill livestock to be put down. She further detailed that the dog had displayed aggressive behavior towards people by biting them, justifying her decision to euthanize the animal. Although South Dakota’s animal cruelty law prohibits subjecting animals to cruelty, it does have exceptions for animals deemed dangerous or a threat to life, limb, or property.

Critics, including both Democrats and Republicans, condemned Noem’s actions, with some likening her to the infamous Cruella De Vil. The backlash extended to social media, with many highlighting the cruelty of the act and questioning the governor’s judgment. Noem’s actions have sparked a broader discussion on animal rights and the responsibilities of pet ownership.

Noem’s account of the incident, as detailed in her memoir, has reignited debates on the treatment of animals and the ethical considerations involved in euthanizing pets. The governor’s defense of her actions based on the dog’s behavior has divided opinions, with some questioning the morality of her decision.

The controversy surrounding Noem’s admission adds to a series of scandals she has faced in recent times, potentially impacting her political career. As she remains a potential vice presidential nominee for Donald Trump, the fallout from this revelation could have lasting implications on her political future. Discussions on animal welfare laws and ethical treatment of animals are likely to continue in the wake of this contentious revelation.