Davos, Switzerland — Former Vice President Al Gore drew attention at the World Economic Forum when he expressed his disapproval of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s remarks during a high-profile dinner. The event, hosted by billionaire Larry Fink, saw Lutnick address an audience of global leaders and business magnates, where he suggested that Europe is losing its competitive edge and controversially advocated for prioritizing coal over renewable energy sources.

As Lutnick delivered his speech, mixed reactions emerged from the audience. Reports indicate that Gore, along with others, voiced their dissent, with sources stating he was one of the attendees who openly jeered during the address. After Lutnick finished speaking, Gore approached him and stated his disagreement, signaling that he felt compelled to make his views known.

In a statement, Gore clarified his actions, saying, “I listened carefully to his remarks. While I didn’t interject during his speech, I felt the need to react once he concluded.” He went on to express his strong opposition to the current energy policies, labeling them as irrational.

The Commerce Department, however, contested the accounts, asserting that Gore was the sole attendee who booed during Lutnick’s address, suggesting that other reactions have been overstated.

The annual economic summit, which began earlier in the week, is expected to continue through Friday, featuring notable speakers, including President Donald Trump, who attended with several members of his cabinet. Trump is slated to deliver remarks aimed at shaping national and global economic discussions.

The stark contrast in opinions on energy policy at the summit highlights deep divides among leaders regarding the direction of sustainable practices amidst growing concerns about climate change. Gore, a long-time advocate for environmental issues, emphasized the urgency of addressing these matters, especially in the context of global discussions about energy.

As debates surrounding energy policy evolve, the exchange at this year’s forum may reflect broader conflicts in attitudes toward climate responsibility versus economic strategy, inviting further dialogue among world leaders long after the event concludes.