COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Amid escalating tensions over Greenland, U.S. President Donald Trump indicated he might impose tariffs on countries that do not support U.S. control over the Arctic territory. This statement coincided with a visit by a bipartisan congressional delegation to Denmark aimed at easing diplomatic strains.

For months, Trump has pushed the idea of U.S. ownership of Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of NATO ally Denmark. He previously suggested that failing to secure control could be “unacceptable.” This rhetoric has caused concern among Denmark and other European nations, as they reiterate that decisions regarding the territory fall solely to them.

At a recent event at the White House, Trump remarked on his approach to European allies regarding tariffs, hinting he could extend such measures to Greenland if necessary. “I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security,” he said, underlining his administration’s assertive stance on the matter.

Earlier this week, discussions involving the foreign ministers of Denmark, Greenland, and U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, produced little resolution and highlighted stark differences in views. While both nations have agreed to establish a working group, the details appear contentious, leading to diverging public opinions from the Danish government and the White House.

Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen stated that European leaders are united in affirming that matters regarding Greenland should be settled primarily by its administration. The Danish government is also enhancing its military presence in Greenland to bolster cooperation with allies amid growing geopolitical tensions in the Arctic region.

U.S. lawmakers visiting Copenhagen expressed a commitment to maintaining and nurturing strong ties with Denmark and Greenland. Senator Chris Coons acknowledged the long-standing partnership, thanking the hosts for their support over the past 225 years.

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska emphasized the importance of viewing Greenland as an ally rather than merely a strategic asset. She noted that public sentiment among Americans is largely against the idea of acquiring the territory, with a significant majority expressing disapproval.

Legislation introduced by Murkowski and Senator Jeanne Shaheen aims to prohibit the use of U.S. federal funds for any annexation efforts concerning Greenland or any NATO member state without mutual consent. This move reflects an effort by Congress to establish clear boundaries in U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding alliances.

In Greenland, leaders have voiced concerns over the inflammatory rhetoric from the U.S. administration. Politician Aaja Chemnitz criticized the exaggerations and threats coming from the U.S., maintaining that the discourse around Greenland has been largely filled with misinformation.

As discussions continue, concerns about the implications of U.S. ambitions on Greenland’s autonomy are gaining traction, with local leaders calling for a focus on their rights and perspective. Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has affirmed a preference for European relations, indicating a choice for the security and alliances surrounding the Kingdom of Denmark rather than alignment with the U.S.

The increasing pressure from the U.S. is prompting reflection among indigenous leaders and residents. Sara Olsvig, chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Council, articulated fears of a return to colonial practices, cautioning against the perception of Greenland as a strategic prize rather than a sovereign entity with its own rights.

As the geopolitical landscape evolves, the fate of Greenland and its intricate relationships with both the U.S. and Denmark remains uncertain, with local voices advocating for their independence and recognition in the ongoing dialogue.