WILMINGTON, Del. – Opening statements are set to begin Tuesday in the federal gun case against Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden. The trial comes after a jury was selected, with the first lady in attendance and the president offering his support. Hunter Biden faces three felonies related to a 2018 firearm purchase during a period of substance abuse. Allegations include providing false information to a gun dealer and possessing the firearm unlawfully.

The trial’s timing, just days after Donald Trump’s conviction on multiple felonies in New York City, highlights the legal focus in the lead-up to the 2024 election. Hunter Biden’s case has drawn attention for potential special treatment concerns, with Republicans criticizing the defunct plea deal. Despite pleading not guilty, Hunter Biden asserts he is a target of unfair prosecution.

The jury selection process in Delaware involved dismissing prospective jurors with personal ties to the Biden family or strong political biases. Ultimately, a jury of twelve was chosen along with four female alternates. The jurors, whose identities remain private, reflect diverse backgrounds and experiences.

In addition to the ongoing trial in Delaware, Hunter Biden faces separate charges in California for tax evasion amounting to $1.4 million. A failed plea deal led to Attorney General Merrick Garland appointing a special counsel, ultimately resulting in indictments.

The trial’s narrative intersects family tragedy, substance abuse, and legal scrutiny, placing additional pressure on the Biden family. Concerns about the toll on President Biden’s emotional state amid low poll numbers and upcoming campaign events persist. The president, emphasizing his role as a father, expressed unwavering support for his son.

The proceedings, unfolding in the context of personal struggles and political implications, are expected to bring forth sensitive and difficult memories for the Biden family. Despite concerns, White House officials maintain that the trial will not compromise the president’s ability to fulfill his duties.

As the trial progresses, the public awaits the outcome of a case that intertwines personal struggles with legal consequences. The implications extend beyond individual culpability, resonating with broader discussions on justice, accountability, and familial dynamics.