Project 2025 Director Resigns Amid Controversy: Trump’s Former Advisor Leads Blueprint for Republican Administration

Washington, D.C. – The director of Project 2025, a controversial blueprint for the next Republican administration, has resigned from his position at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The project, spanning over 900 pages, proposed significant governmental reforms, such as expanding presidential powers and reducing the number of civil servants.

Paul Dans, the architect of Project 2025, has left his role to focus on continued advocacy work, according to Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts. Despite disavowals from former President Trump, critics highlight that the project is spearheaded by individuals who previously held positions in his administration.

Having served in senior roles within the Trump administration, Dans led the 2025 Presidential Transition Project at Heritage, developing policy recommendations and training materials for potential appointees in the next administration. Roberts emphasized that the project aimed to unify conservative organizations towards a common vision of empowering citizens and reducing bureaucratic influence.

Project 2025, launched in 2022, aimed to complete its policy drafting following the party conventions, aligning with typical practices of think tanks in Washington, D.C. The project’s “Mandate for Leadership,” a detailed document outlining key priorities, faced scrutiny and opposition from liberal groups since Trump’s rise to prominence.

Among the proposals outlined in the mandate are significant restructuring of government departments, prioritizing family values, and implementing tax cuts. Despite Trump’s public disavowal of the project, many of his supporters have endorsed the ideas embedded in Project 2025.

Opposition figures have raised concerns about the project’s implications for fundamental rights and the role of government in society. Democratic nominee Kamala Harris has warned of the potential consequences of Trump’s alignment with the project’s objectives, urging voters to consider the stakes in the upcoming election.

As the project continues to generate debate and attention, its influence on future policy directions remains a topic of interest. Stay tuned for more developments on this evolving story.