Federal Judge at Center of Abortion Drug Case Has History with Conservative Causes

San Antonio, TX – A federal judge who is at the center of a case involving the abortion pill, Mifeprex, has a history with conservative causes, according to reports. Judge Kyle Duncan, who was appointed by President Trump in 2018, made headlines last year when he sided with Texas in a lawsuit seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act.

The case involving Mifeprex revolves around the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and their regulations regarding the drug. In 2016, the FDA revised their guidelines, which allowed women to use the drug up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. However, the lawsuit seeks to revert back to the previous regulations, which limit the use of Mifeprex to no more than 49 days of pregnancy.

Critics argue that the old regulations are outdated and unsafe, while supporters of the lawsuit claim that the drug is dangerous and could cause harm to women.

The case is set to be heard before Judge Duncan on Wednesday, and both sides are preparing for a heated battle. Anti-abortion advocates are expected to gather outside the courthouse in support of the lawsuit.

Opponents of the case are concerned that Judge Duncan’s conservative views could impact the outcome of the case. They argue that his history with conservative causes, including his support of voter ID laws and opposition to same-sex marriage, suggest that he may not be impartial in this case.

Proponents of the lawsuit, however, argue that Judge Duncan’s previous rulings show that he is committed to upholding the law and protecting the rights of Americans.

Regardless of the outcome of the case, it is clear that the debate over Mifeprex and abortion rights continues to be a contentious issue in the United States.