Washington, D.C. — In a notable shift, the Biden administration is launching a detailed review of Smithsonian museums to address concerns regarding the portrayal of American history. A recent White House document obtained by independent sources highlights issues raised by the public, suggesting that some exhibits could reflect an excessively negative view of the nation’s past.

The document specifically targets seven major museums within the Smithsonian Institution, citing concerns over exhibits that include a Benjamin Franklin display, which connects his scientific contributions to his history as a slave owner, and a film addressing the murder of George Floyd, which is said to misrepresent police actions. Officials believe these exhibits contribute to a narrative that dwells heavily on oppression rather than celebrating America’s achievements.

A White House representative noted that the administration aims to “trim the excess” from Smithsonian content. “We are committed to ensuring that these institutions accurately represent our history,” they stated, emphasizing the importance of accountability within cultural institutions. The official indicated that the administration is awaiting a comprehensive response from the Smithsonian regarding the status of various artifacts, which have reportedly been withdrawn from display.

This initiative, announced on a social media platform by Donald Trump, includes claims that the Smithsonian excessively portrays the nation in a negative light. Trump remarked on the matter, asserting that the focus of many exhibits leans too heavily on topics like slavery and the failures of American society.

The museums under scrutiny include the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of the American Latino, and the National Portrait Gallery, among others. Concerns raised in the document suggest that the exhibitions focus too much on historical oppression, potentially overshadowing notable American successes.

For instance, officials flagged the ¡Presente! Latino history exhibition at the National Museum of American History for allegedly promoting an “anti-American agenda” by discussing colonial impacts and territorial disputes with Mexico. Additionally, the display of the Star-Spangled Banner has drawn criticism for emphasizing historical controversies over national pride.

Further, the review also draws attention to the National Portrait Gallery’s focus on how the Chinese Exclusion Act conflicts with the Statue of Liberty’s symbolism. The National Museum of African Art is under fire for its film on George Floyd, while the Asian Art Museum faces scrutiny for exhibits that criticize Western influence on traditional cultures.

Last week, officials from the White House budget office sent requests to several museums, demanding information about their exhibits within a month. They called for content adjustments, including the alteration of language deemed “divisive.”

The Smithsonian’s response to this burgeoning scrutiny remains unclear. Notably, the institution has already taken steps to revise its historical displays, having removed references to Trump’s impeachments from an exhibit at the National Museum of American History. This adjustment leaves only general mentions of other presidents who have faced impeachment processes.

Critics of the review suggest that this push aligns with broader efforts by the administration to shape educational narratives in universities and institutions throughout the nation. As the debate over how history is presented continues, the Smithsonian faces a critical moment that could redefine its role in American cultural representation.