Washington, DC – The US Supreme Court has tasked Judge Tanya Chutkan with the responsibility of interpreting Trump’s immunity in legal matters. The decision comes amidst a flurry of legal challenges faced by the former president.

Clarence Thomas has criticized the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith in a case involving SCOTUS immunity. The implications of this critique could have far-reaching consequences for future legal proceedings involving high-profile figures.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump appears to be strategically avoiding pre-election trials in the majority of his criminal cases. This move could potentially shield him from facing legal repercussions and prolong the resolution of these cases.

In a separate development, the Supreme Court has delivered a significant ruling on a First Amendment case today. The decision is expected to have a profound impact on the interpretation of free speech rights in the country.

“The President Is Now a King”: Dissent against the handling of the Trump immunity case reflects the growing discontent and debate over the limits of executive power. This dissent highlights the ongoing tensions between the branches of government and the protection of individual rights.

Overall, these legal battles and decisions underscore the complexities and controversies surrounding the Trump administration and its legacy. The outcomes of these cases will undoubtedly shape the future of legal and political discourse in the United States.